Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Hedda 10 Conference: Mergers and Higher Education Cooperation

Hedda (Higher Education Development Association) is celebrating its 10th Anniversary with a one-day conference on 4th of November, 2011. The conference is themed “Mergers and Higher Education Cooperation” and takes place at the University of Oslo, the coordinating institution of Hedda.

Issues related to institutional mergers are now high on the agenda in the Nordic countries. In the new global context there is a pronounced focus on having the most effective institutions to produce new knowledge and contribute to innovation and economic development, in an increasingly unstable and financially restrained environment. Within this context, higher education institutions in a variety of countries are going through merger processes. However – what do we know about the dynamics of institutional mergers and the outcomes of these processes?

The conference highlights some international developments, in addition to giving an insight into some of the recent processes in the Nordic countries.

The aim of the conference is to bring together research and practice, featuring keynotes from top international researchers in the field and providing the practical insights from people who have held top executive positions in a merger process. We feel that this anniversary celebration captures what Hedda as an organisation is about in its aims to strengthen the relationship between higher education research and practice.

We are pleased to announce Dr. Leo Goedegebuure as the main keynote speaker, he has extensive experience in researching institutional mergers in various contexts and he has published over 100 articles and approximately 15 books, many focused on merger processes.

Practical information about the venue, registration form and updated information on additional keynote speakers will be added early August and there will be a link provided on the Hedda blog.

Monday, February 7, 2011

New Orleans Merger Proposed

A merger has been proposed in New Orleans that has touched off a lightning rod of controversy and spurred a tremendous amount of media coverage. Gov. Bobby Jindal proposed the merger of the University of New Orleans and the Southern University at New Orleans into a single institution. Jindal cited declining enrollment and poor graduation rates among the reasons for the proposed merger.

Southern, an historically Black institution, would be combined with the traditionally White University of New Orleans. Supporters of historically Black institutions, and specifically of Southern, lament what could potentially be the end of an institution that they say serves a critical mission for minority students. The merger discussion has generated spirited discourse and vehement objection by students, alumni and other supporters of Southern opposed to the merger. Jindal's proposal caught many off-guard, including institutional leaders and politicians.

A consultant is currently conducting a feasibility study for the merger that is expected by March 1.

This proposed merger is flawed on several fronts, and cannot truly be discussed in the same vein as other mutual growth mergers discussed on this blog. The issues include:
  1. Impetus: Gov. Jindal suggests that his chief concern is how to best serve the students of these two institutions. If those concerns are truly paramount, he may wish to look into the literature of student development in historically Black institutions to ascertain student achievement in that setting as opposed to a more integrated student population. Proponents of historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) would suggest herein one would find one of the major advantages of the institutions.
  2. Critical Concerns: Anytime you have students, alumni and others literally protesting an idea immediately upon inception, there will be problems moving the idea forward. At the core are racial issues and the notion of the role of HBCUs in today's society. That is an entirely different debate, one that will not be visited here. As long as people have that concern, it will get in the way of an otherwise fair and reasonable merger discussion. This element simply places it on an entirely different level.
  3. Process: If Gov. Jindal really wanted this merger to happen, he should have begun the process with the institutions themselves, not with a bully pulpit and fellow politicians. Only by securing the input and buy-in of institutional representatives could this discussion have had a chance to move forward in a rational, meaningful way. It is the process of having something done "to you" rather than "by you." Add in the racial underpinnings, and the situation was destined for disaster from the beginning.
In the end, while there are some ardent politicians that are in support of this merger, it likely does not have a realistic chance to take place in the near future. There is simply too much opposition, and the process was flawed from the start. One cannot have a realistic debate about the merger when there are so many individuals vehemently opposed to it. Whether the opponents' concerns are valid or not, they are there, and this merger, if enacted, would tremendously upset and alienate countless individuals for a very long time.

Recent articles on the subject are listed below.

New Jersey Merger Update

The proposed mergers in New Jersey have garnered a significant amount of press lately, and with only a fair amount of controversy. The merger discussion now centers around a combination of the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School and the School of Public Health from the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) with Rutgers University. Conversations that formerly involved merging Thomas Edison State College into Rutgers seem to no longer be at the forefront of discussions.

The prospects for this merger coming to fruition seem to be average to decent, with the positives in the potential synergies and prestige that may come from adding the medical school into Rutgers. Of concern is what would remain of UMDNJ. Additionally, it is troublesome that this merger is coming at the suggestion of politicians. The Rutgers president buys into the proposal, though the UMDNJ leadership has not been as positive about the discussions. The most effective mergers occur with buy-in of all parties, and the impetus to merge coming from within.

Recent articles on the subject are listed below.

Saturday, January 8, 2011

New Jersey Mergers Back on the Table

Mergers previously suggested in New Jersey are actively under discussion again as part of Gov. Chris Christie's Higher Education Task Force. The plans are one component of an overall strategy to plot the course of higher education in the state. A merger has been proposed multiple times before of Rutgers University and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey. The plan highlights the academic synergies that can result as having a medical school part of a comprehensive research university. The plan also includes eventual increases in state support for public universities.

University Mergers Sweep Across Europe

The Chronicle of Higher Education recently published an article on a surge of university mergers in Europe. The reasons for the mergers seem to be driven largely by a desire to improve the global ranking of the institutions.